Hurricane Katrina – August 23-30, 2005
HAARP was highly active in the weeks before Katrina, during, and a short time after. The correlation is therefore not complete. If HAARP
were inactive during that time, then it could be proven that it had
absolutely nothing to do with Katrina, but since it was indeed active,
a possible link still remains.
August 22 – Remnants of Tropical Depression Ten move into position.
August 23 – Remnants form into Tropical Depression Twelve.
August 24 – Depression strengthens and is renamed Tropical Storm Katrina.
August 25 – Katrina strengthens and becomes Category 1 hurricane and strikes southeast Florida.
August 26
– Katrina weakens to tropical storm, exits on the west side of Florida
into warm waters, then re-intensifies into a Category 1 hurricane. It
rapidly gains strength.
August 27 – Katrina reaches the central Gulf and becomes a large and well-organized Category 3 hurricane.
August 28
– Katrina comes within a few hundred miles off the coast and grows to
Category 4 early in the day, then to Category 5 by midday.
August 29 – Katrina makes landfall with 155 mph winds.
August 30 – Katrina weakens to a heavy storm affecting Tennessee and surrounding areas.
Sources: Wikipedia and National Geographic
Hurricane Ophelia – September 8-16, 2005
Hurricane
Ophelia never got past Category 1. But it had a highly erratic,
meandering pathway including a clockwise loop halfway through
(September 10-12).
Forecasters
had a tough time predicting its path and behavior. The hurricane formed
on September 8, slipping in and out of hurricane status several times
before fizzling out on September 16 and moving into the North Atlantic.
Sources: Wikipedia and Palm Beach Post
This chart compares HAARP activity with Ophelia’s wind speed:
If HAARP had anything to do with this, it would more likely have been for testing hurricane steering.
2006 and 2007
The two years following Katrina had very quiet hurricane seasons compared to what was predicted.
2006 Hurricane Forecast a Flop
MIAMI
(AP – Dec 2006) — The mild 2006 Atlantic hurricane season draws to a
close Thursday without a single hurricane striking the United States —
a stark contrast to the record-breaking 2005 season that killed more
than 1,500 people and left thousands homeless along the Gulf Coast.
Nine named storms and five hurricanes formed this season, and just two of the hurricanes were considered major. […]
In May, scientists predicted 13 to 16 named storms and eight to 10 hurricanes, with four to six of them major. […]
Bell
urged people not to become complacent about the next season (2007),
which starts June 1. Forecasters say the Atlantic is still in an active
hurricane period that began in 1995 and could last another decade or
more. (source)
Very Active 2007 Hurricane Season Predicted
Science Daily
(Apr. 3, 2007) — The U.S. Atlantic basin will likely experience a very
active hurricane season, the Colorado State University forecast team
announced today, increasing its earlier prediction for the 2007
hurricane season.
The team’s
forecast now anticipates 17 named storms forming in the Atlantic basin
between June 1 and Nov. 30. Nine of the 17 storms are predicted to
become hurricanes, and of those nine, five are expected to develop into
intense or major hurricanes (Saffir/Simpson category 3-4-5) with
sustained winds of 111 mph or greater. (source)
2007 Hurricane Season Ending Raises Forecast Concerns
National
Geographic (November 30, 2007) – The 2007 Atlantic hurricane season,
which officially ends today, has—like last year—failed to live up to
the predictions of forecasters.
Now
some experts fear the second year of inaccurate preseason predictions
will shake the public’s faith in all hurricane forecasts—even when a
storm is bearing down upon them. (source)
Compared
to a prediction of 17 storms, 9 of those hurricanes, and 5 major
hurricanes, 2007 instead ended with 15 storms, 6 hurricanes, and 2
major ones. So compared to forecasts, 2007 and 2006 were surprisingly
calm.
Hurricane Bertha
Recently the first hurricane of the 2008 season formed.
Big Bertha: A Bad Omen?
Washington
Post (July 8, 2008) – After explosive development yesterday, Hurricane
Bertha is struggling today. Its maximum winds have dropped from 120 mph
last night to 105 mph as of 11 a.m. and it has been downgraded to a
category two storm. […]
While
it remains to be seen whether Bertha will affect any land areas, it
will go down in history as a record-breaking storm and may be a
harbinger of a very active hurricane season. […] Bertha easily broke
the record for becoming the furthest east named storm prior to August
1. (source)
Hurricane Bertha “One for the Record Books”
The Daily Green (July 9, 2008) – From the start, there was something pretty odd about Hurricane Bertha.
The
storm formed just before Independence Day last week, and immediately
showed plenty of it. Bertha developed from a tropical wave almost
immediately as the disturbance came off the coast of Africa, and so
became the most easterly forming July tropical storm known to us, as
well as the most easterly forming Atlantic tropical storm period. […]
As
Bertha moved steadily westward, she intensified, first becoming a
hurricane and then exploding into a powerful Category 3 major hurricane
Monday with 120 mile per hour winds — and possibly, for a brief while,
a Category 4. It’s the earliest we’ve seen such an intense Atlantic
hurricane since the year 2005, when hurricanes Dennis and Emily were
Category 4 and 5 storms, respectively, in July. Dennis reached Category
4 strength on July 7 of that year … the same day on which Bertha
exploded three years later.
That’s
a particularly worrisome precedent because in 2005, the hurricane year
only got worse after Dennis — featuring Category 5s Katrina, Rita, and
Wilma.
But perhaps even more
worrisome is this recent appearance of very intense hurricanes in July,
a month that traditionally has not featured many of them. Says Holland:
“It is notable that we have had a remarkable run of July storms, which
over the past decade have been running more than 50% above the previous
average.” Technically, given her origins so close to the African coast,
Bertha is categorized as a Cape Verde-type hurricane, and those tend to
be the most powerful and destructive of them all. But they don’t
generally form until later in the hurricane season … or, at least,
that’s how it used to be. (source)
The
most important feature of this hurricane was how rapidly it grew on
July 7 before weakening just as quickly. At sunrise it was Category 1,
and within twelve short hours Bertha had grown into a Category 3
(possibly 4) hurricane. Something unusual happened just on that
afternoon. Here are the HAARP charts before, during, and after this event:
Notice that the only significant activity occurs during a short window of time. The July 7 chart shows HAARP was active between 16:25 and 17:25 UTC — between 12:25 PM and 1:25 PM Eastern Time — on that same Monday afternoon when Bertha suddenly became Category 3.
HAARP
was not active before or after that event, and likewise Bertha was not
as strong before or after. Bertha faded out afterwards. The correlation
there is complete.
If HAARP
was responsible for manipulating Hurricane Bertha, then the fact that
it happened so quickly and nothing destructive ultimately came of it
indicates a test or practice run. And with news of Bertha being a
record-breaking hurricane foreshadowing an ominous hurricane season,
the stage is set for an orchestrated hurricane disaster this fall. An
opportune target, considering current political and economic
conditions, would be the gasoline refineries surrounding Houston, Texas.
Update – July 15: HAARP went active July 14-15, coinciding once again with Bertha (just a strong storm now) strengthening suddenly.
Sunday July 13 – no activity.
Monday July 14 – HAARP goes active between 10:00 – 22:30 UTC (6 AM – 6:30 PM Eastern).
“After
looking rather anemic early Monday morning …Bertha’s ‘convection’
erupted during the day along with the storm also getting more
symmetrically and solidly organized by late afternoon. […]”
“From
the southwest edge of the eye, near the radar site, to the northeast
edge, was just a hair under 150 kilometers (the rings are spaced every
50 km), or about 90 miles. I don’t know if there’s an official “record”
for eye diameter, but I can’t offhand remember ever seeing any that
have been bigger than that.” (source)
Tuesday July 15 – “From the National Hurricane Center: BERTHA IS NOW THE LONGEST-LIVED JULY TROPICAL STORM IN ATLANTIC” (source)
Bertha had been weakening for days leading up to July 14, while HAARP had been quiet for that same period of time. Then HAARP
turned on, and Bertha rapidly gained strength. Further, it gained
strength at precisely the right moment to hit Bermuda the hardest.
Together with the July 7 charts, this makes a very strong case that
Bertha’s sudden strength gains are linked to HAARP.
Myanmar Cyclone and China’s 2008 Earthquake
Both the cyclone that hit Burma and the earthquake that struck China tightly coincided with the same HAARP activity period.
Cyclone Nargis was the worst natural disaster to hit Burma in recorded history, killing at least 85,000 people. The China earthquake led to the deaths of at least 80,000 people.
HAARP activity began at 5:45 UTC on April 27, 2008.
“In
the last week of April 2008, an area of deep convection persisted near
a low-level circulation in the Bay of Bengal about 1150 km (715 mi)
east-southeast of Chennai, India.”
“On April 28 Nargis became nearly stationary while located between ridges to its northwest and southeast. That day the JTWC upgraded the storm to cyclone status, the equivalent of a minimal hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale.”
“Early on April 29, the JTWC estimated Nargis reached winds of 160 km/h (100 mph), and at the same time the IMD
classified the system as a very severe cyclonic storm. […] By late on
April 29, convection had begun to rebuild, though immediate
restrengthening was prevented by increased wind shear”
“On
May 1, after turning nearly due eastward, Cyclone Nargis began rapidly
intensifying, due to greatly improved outflow in association with an
approaching upper-level trough. Strengthening continued as it developed
a well-defined eye with a diameter of 19 km (12 mi), and early on May 2
the JTWC estimated the cyclone reached peak
winds of 215 km/h (135 mph) as it approached the coast of Burma, making
it a category 4 storm.”
“Around 1200 UTC
on May 2, Cyclone Nargis made landfall in the Ayeyarwady Division of
Burma at peak strength. The storm gradually weakened as it procceded
east over Burma, with its proximity to the Andaman Sea preventing rapid
weakening. Its track turned to the northeast due to the approach of a
mid-latitude trough to its northwest, passing just north of Yangon with
winds of 130 km/h (80 mph).”
“Early on May 3 the IMD
issued its final advisory on the storm. It quickly weakened after
turning to the northeast toward the rugged terrain near the
Burma-Thailand border, and after deteriorating to minimal tropical
storm status, the JTWC issued its last advisory on Nargis.” (source)
After Nargis, HAARP continued operating for another week:
HAARP ceased activity at 22 UTC on May 11, 2008. The China earthquake struck a little more than eight hours later at 6:28 UTC on May 12. In the days and minutes before the quake, there were reports of strange phenomena including bizarre toad behavior and iridescent clouds. Earthquakes are typically “in the works” days or weeks before going off, and animals, sensitive people, and scalar detectors can sense the nonphysical precursors to these quakes.
One
has to wonder, if earthquakes generate and are preceded by scalar
waves, could scalar waves likewise trigger earthquakes? If so, the
phased array of various ionospheric heaters around the world may be
capable of doing this for political and military purposes. The quake
was certainly convenient for western military factions:
Earthquake Destroyed China’s Largest Military Armory, Says Source
A
high-level Chinese military source secretly disclosed last week that
the recent earthquake in Sichuan Province caused a chain-reaction of
explosions in the Sichuan mountain areas. The explosions destroyed
Chinese army’s largest armory, new weapon test bases and part of
nuclear facilities including several nuclear warheads. This information
is considered China’s top military secret. […]
After
carefully analyzing seismic data, military experts in southeast Asia
confirmed a non-geological shock had occurred at the earthquake
epicenter. The energy released was equivalent to that of an underground
nuclear explosion. (source)
There
is not enough actual energy being outputted by ionospheric heaters to
directly power an earthquake, but they don’t need that much power if
they merely act as nonlinear imbalancers, triggers, or redirectors of
existing large natural energy flows.
Was the earthquake just a random natural event? Or was it strategically and intentionally created? Consider this:
- The official death toll was 80,000.
- HAARP shut off ~8 hours before the quake struck.
- Earthquake was of magnitude 8.0.
- It happened on May 12th (5/12 = 5 + 1 + 2 = 8).
- The earthquake occurred exactly 88 days before the Beijing Olympics.
- The Olympics will begin on 8/8/08 at 8:08 PM.
Coincidence?