Now that you see the world differently what will you do ?

Will you sit there and ponder further, or will you take action and speak out to others that are in the Dark.

The only Choice is the One you Make.



“What if it suddenly came out that Kennedy wasn’t killed by Oswald"  

J.F.K lies and Deception

"Lee Harvey Oswald"

Within two Hour's of killing President kennedy, a suspect, Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested. Throughout the time Oswald was in custody, he stuck to his story that he had not been involved in the assassination. On November 24th while, being transported by the Dallas police from the city to the county jail, Oswald was shot dead by Jack Ruby, (1911 - '67), a Dallas businessman with Mafia and other underworld connections, who later was videotaped saying, "Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people had, that had [sic] so much to gain and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."

John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline

JFK and JackieThis is a special photo of JFK and Jaqueline from happy days in their life. I registered as a Democrat to vote for John Kennedy. I cried as I drove home from Cabrillo Junior College (Santa Cruz County) that closed after the announcement was made about his assassination on Nov. 22, 1963, In 1992 I found out who really killed him and your time will be well spent as you read all fully documented proof I have found that the limousine driver, William Greer, actually fired the fatal shot that day. I even have a special section of "additional confirmations" coroborating the fact that Greer did, in fact, shoot Kennedy.

William Greer


"Hundreds of books on the Kennedy assassination have appeared,"

writes Kaiser, who teaches at the Naval War College and has published a previous book with Harvard about the Vietnam War, "but this is the first one written by a professional historian who has researched the available archives. Partly because of the evidentiary excesses or deficiencies of so many other authors, I have written this book not only to show what happened but to make clear how we know it."

Kaiser explains how Kennedy assassination research got off "to an unfortunate start. Much of this early work became an exercise in trying to show that [Lee Harvey] Oswald, who was indeed guilty, did not commit the crime. On the other hand, most of those who believed that Oswald was the assassin . . . have argued vehemently, in the face of a great deal of contrary evidence, that he acted without any help or encouragement from anyone."


  Findings of the select Committee on the Assassintion of the President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Tex., November 22, 1963.

A. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President kennedy in Dallas, Tex, November 22, 1963. The second and third shot fired killed the President.

B. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President.

C. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

D. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

E. Agencies and departments of the U.S. Government performed with varying degrees of competency in the fulfillment [sic] of their duties. President John F. Kennedy did not receive adequate protection. The investigation into the possibility of conspiracy in the assassination was inadequate.

F. The Secret Service was deficient in the performance of its duties.

G. The Department of Justice failed to exercise initiative in supervising and directing the investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the assassination.

H. The Federal Bureau of Investigation failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President.

I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation was deficient in its sharing of information with other agencies and departments.

J. The Central Intelligence Agency was deficient in its collection and sharing of information both prior to and subsequent to the assassination.

K. The Warren Commission failed to investigate adequately the possibility of a conspiracy to assassinate the President. This deficiency was attributable in part to the failure of the Commission to receive all the relevant information that was in the possession of other agencies and departments of the Government."

A flow chart to show how Oswald was set up as the fall guy in the JFK assassination

Oswald Patsy Setup flow chart This flow chart based upon the Torbitt Document, which is a researchers tool written by a Dallas attorney under a pseudonym, William Torbitt, who got his info from two government agents who defected and had to remain anonymous to protect their lives. It shows the little known fact that Walter Dornberger {Werner Von Braun was his superior}, former Nazi in charge of en-slaving and later killing Jews at the German V-2 rocket factory in Dora, was brought in to this country, narrowly escaping death at the Nuremburg Tribunals, and was then placed on the board of directors of Bell Helicopters. The choppers made by Bell, as you can see, were major assets in the Vietnam war following the JFK assassination. Dornberger hired Michael Piane, an engineering designer and Office of Naval Intelligence(ONI) Dornbergers hiring of Michael Paine was his contribution to the JFK assassination cabal, because Michael, as an ONI operative, had the job of not only relocating Marina Oswald to the U.S., but to have his wife, Ruth Paine, secure a job for Oswald at the Dallas Book Depository for the deep cover. The illuminati cover all the bases. Everything was all scripted out for the blue ribbon Warren Commission...whose finding was that Oswald acted alone.


"Secret Service men Pull Back and are confused"

Secret service that were following immediately behind JFK's limo pull back and stand down. while Kennedy's limo pulls forward -without them -for the final leg into the killing zone. 

(Video Below)

Overhead view of the Presidential limousine, Nov. 22, 1963

We know from frame 312 of the Zapruder film that just after President Kennedy had been hit in the throat he turned at the last second to his left almost facing Jackie. which exposed his right temple to the front of the car. Statements made by seven different Parkland Hospital doctors including Dr. Robert N. McClelland, Dr. Paul Peters and Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw indicate that the original appearance of the wound to Kennedy’s head was a large gaping entry wound to his right temple (left as you face him) and a much larger exit wound in the right rear of his head. A right side head wound is indicated in the statements of Doctors Malcom Perry, Charles Baxter, Robert N. McClelland, William Kemp Clark and M.T. Jenkins, found at this link:

In this overhead view of the limousine and its occupants, the trajectory of a bullet that would cause this kind of wound has been traced backwards to the point of origin, which is the right shoulder of William Greer, the limousine driver. It should also be noted that Dr. McClelland also made testimony to the Warren Commission that the head wound could have been caused by "a handgun fired at close range." Ref: Conspiracy of Silence, Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw, High Treason, Robert J. Groden and Harrison E. Livingstone, and Murder from Within, Fred Newcomb and Perry Adams.

Dr CRenshaw Note from 1994

JPG scan of personal note from Charles Crenshaw dated 1-26-94

I wrote to Dr. Charles A. Crenshaw in 1994 to get his exact description of how President Kennedy's wounds appeared to him at Parkland Hospital in Dallas. This reply matches the description in the caption of the car diagram above.

Letter from David Naro to Dr. Cyril Wecht

In Dallas the wound at the back of Kennedy’s head was an exit wound. The direction of the bullet reversed when he was at Bethesda Naval Hospital getting the "official autopsy."



Cover of the Globe, issue of March 17, 1992

On January 29, 1992, I succeeded in getting a letter to the editor published in the San Luis Obispo Telegram-Tribune with the headline "Zapruder Film Shows the Ugly truth about Dallas". the same letter was published in our local weekly paper, "The New Times," under the headline, "The Limo Diver Did It." I wrote these letters to the editor based upon my initial viewing of the research video, "Dallas Revisited" done for some local researchers by South Bay Video Productions, right here in San Luis Obispo, CA., where I live.

Globe Headline says JFK Limo Driver Did ItShortly after these letters were published, a writer for the Globe, Paul Bannister, contacted me and interviewed me. I showed him my copy of "Dallas Revisited" and some stills I made of frames 312 and 313 of the Zapruder film from a high quality broadcast video. Paul combined my information with work by fellow reporter Bob Boyd who accessed some Dallas Police Dept. files and the article was written. Before publication, The Globe called me from Florida to make sure William Greer was dead. I checked with my local sources and was able to assure the Globe publishers that Greer had died of stomach cancer. After the Globe appeared on every newstand in America, I got phone calls from all over the country from people that agreed with me! The most important call came from Maine from one Tyler Newcomb, a musician, who gave me the phone number of his father, Fred Newcomb, who with fellow researcher Perry Adams of Santa Barbara, wrote the still unpublished book "Murder From Within," which has a 1975 Copyright.

I interviewed Fred for over 3 hours on March 12, 1992 and taped the interview. This was simultaneous with the March 17, 1992 Globe article. Fred commented to me that publishers would not publish the book "because they are scared." I saw the actual self-published edition and it bristles with documentation. Fred had such a compelling book because he went to Dallas in 1968 when witness memories were still fresh. I will publish on this web page a detailed narrative of much little-known information that will make the case for Greer shooting JFK in a way that as not been previously accomplished. I want to mention here that this is the second time I have had this Globe cover scanned. You see, the first time I had it done, the feds hacked my web tv scrapbook and removed this and a scan of a OP-ED piece that I had published 4-18-92 in the same Telegram-Tribune with the headline "Many People Believe JFK’s Killer Was In The Car."

Headline from my Op-Ed piece that appeared in the Telegram-Tribune 4-18-92. My article filled the entire page.

William Greer, the limo driver 

The limousine driver, brakes the car, turns and sees he still has a live passenger, and then takes the already drawn .45 Cal. Colt pistol in his left hand and rests it on his right shoulder firing the single shot that causes Kennedy’s fatal head wound. At least six people see him as noted above and five more people smell gunsmoke in the car. Fred Newcomb maintains that the gun was etched with bleach into a highlight and aligned with the top of the head of the passenger Secret Service agent Roy Kellerman, to make you "think" that this was just a highlight on Kellerman’s head. This is the source of many researcher arguements. Existing photos of Kellerman show him to not have a flat head nor a butch haircut. If we are to believe that is his head.....then it is FLAT AS A BOARD! 


The J.F.K Assassination

Abraham Zapruder film

"In the Abraham Zapruder Film, it shows frame by frame the Assassination of President Kennedy"

Abraham Zapruder, [Frames 238, 312, 313, 314 and other stills from 8mm home movie of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy Jr.], November 22, 1963

President Kennedy is "First Shot" hear and puts his hand over his mouth


In this still image of the J.F.K Assasination, you can see wife Jacqueline holding her hand out while President Kennedy spits something into her hand moments before the second Fatal kill shot.


The moment of the second shot fired to J.F.K's Head 


Evidence at the scene of the crime

Movement of the head

There is no controversy over the fact (since it is preserved on film) that immediately following the shots Kennedy’s head was propelled backwards and slammed against the seat of the car. Those who maintain that all shots came from the back explain the backward movement of the head either as a jet propulsion phenomenon (from brain material coming out of the front of the head) or as due to a neuromuscular reaction. The jet propulsion explanation makes little sense because (among other reasons) all witnesses who observed brain material leaving the head observed it coming from the back, NOT the front of the head. With regard to the neuromuscular reaction explanation, has anyone ever seen a person’s head move forward after being punched in the front of the head?


Still Frames from Zapruder Film Showing driver William Greer Shooting Kennedy

Jean Hill & Mary Moorman adjacent to JFK's limo as Kennedy reacts to first bullets (from the rear) and a moment prior to Greer shooting Kennedy (.45 automatic already resting on Greer's right shoulder)


 "You Need to see the"

Abraham Zapruder Film Below

NOTE, in the video below, how it can be clearly seen when shot number 1 is fired, Kennedy will hold his face, then shot number 2 is fired that kills J.F.K

"Watch the Limo Driver"


"Zapruder Film Shows JFK's Driver (William Greer) Firing Fatal Head Shot"

J.F.K Killed by  Limo Driver



"Note the limo driver looks over shoulder, aims then fires fatal second shot"

In This Frame by Frame Assassination of President Kennedy, You can see clearly the Driver William Greer Shooting J.F.K 

Frame 313 of the Zapruder film

This vid cap of frame 313 of the Zapruder film sickens some people when they reali ze that this clearly shows Secret Service Agent William Greer, shooting JFK. Many would say that this is just a highlight on the passengers head - Roy Kellerman. Don’t kid yourself! The gun has been etched into a highlight to make you "think" it is Kellerman’s head. And Robert J. Groden thinks that the gun is the chrome on the drivers door. Now, how come we can see this chrome through Greers body? New kinda chrome?

Greer and Kellerman

William Greer, the driver of JFK's limousine, and Roy Kellerman, the Secret Service agent who was in the front passenger seat, controlled everything that happened at Parkland Hospital in Dallas while the presidents body was there. They stood next to the doctors trying to save JFK's life, telling them "what happened." It was Roy Kellerman that placed the bullet on the stretcher that matched the ammunition used by the Manlicher Carcano rifle that was placed in the Oswald-patsie snipers nest. {ED Note: The Manlicer Carcano rifle abounded in Illuminati symbolism because it costs $23.00 and recycles in 2.3 seconds - "23" is one of their Big Time numbers.}This planted "stretcher bullet" was necessary to corroborate the hole in Kennedy's back that was put there by an cabal operative to further convince us that he was shot from the rear. When Roy Kellerman was asked about this bullet, he replied: "it probably worked itself out during cardiac massage." [Larry Ed Note - bullets cannot work themselves out because the inflammation process would hold them in.] Newcomb found out from his research that within 48 hours of the assassination before Oswald was arrested, the FBI questioned both Greer and Kellerman, treating them like suspects. Kellermans statements to the FBI, found in the National Archives by Newcomb, all support JFK being shot from the rear. His statement was that President said "'my God, I'm hit,' and then reaches around and grabs his back." Anyone who has seen the Zapruder film knows that Kennedy first grabs his throat and then is slammed violently backward by a shot from the front. i.e. Kellerman is lying through his teeth to save his butt!


"This a multi angeled video of the kennedy Assassination"

Note how the Driver can be seen looking over shoulder, aiming the gun, then firing the second Fatal shot

"President Kennedy Died for the truth he was going to release to the public"

The final Proof that he was killed by the driver,

"William Greer"

Where does the December 21, 2012 date originally come from?




"The Hopi and Mayan elders do not prophesy that everything will come to an end. Rather, this is a time of transition from one World Age into another. The message they give concerns our making a choice of how we enter the future ahead. Our moving through with either resistance or acceptance will determine whether the transition will happen with cataclysmic changes or gradual peace and tranquility. The same theme can be found reflected in the prophecies of many other Native American visionaries from Black Elk to Sun Bear." - Joseph Robert Jochmans




 Mayan Sacred Tree



Notice how the figure below is depicted in a seating position inside of what looks to be a mechanical device with leavers and controls




(Also flames can be seen at the bottom of the device and to the sides)





The Wacah Chan (or Whac Chan, a.k.a. Mayan Sacred Tree, Mayan World Tree or Mayan Tree of Life) represented the three levels of the Mayan universe. It was believed that all three universes were joined by a central tree. The roots of the tree plunged into the Maya underworld and its branches reached into the Overworld or the Heavens. The central tree was associated with the color green and the four trees in the Middle World were white, red, yellow, and black. The white tree represented the ancestral dead and the North, the red represented the rising sun and the East, the yellow represented the South and right hand of the sun, the black represented the West and the Underworld.

 ....The Mayans speak of a Reptilian species, referred to often as "Iguana-Men", who descended from the sky to take control of their civilization, teaching them the art of pyramid building as well as demanding human sacrifice. Throughout the world, in apparently unconnected societies, the belief pervades that a Reptilian race lives beneath the Earth


 from a David Icke Interview: So, I went to see her and her name was Christine Fitzgerald. She starts telling me about the connection, all of the treatment of Diana by the Windsors, which was utterly, utterly outrageous. I haven't talked to this lady Christine Fitzgerald about these bizarre stories I'm being told by people around the world. Then, as the conversation unfolded, she said, "Oh, do you know what Diana's nickname for the Windsors was?" I said, "No, go on." She said, "The lizards or the reptiles." And she said, "She used to say, in all seriousness, "They are NOT human!" Christine Fitzgerald went on to tell me: "You know, the Windsors are a reptilian line, they're not human." And that "the British Royal Family, and its inter-linking bloodlines, are actually reptilian, they come from a reptilian extraterrestrial race." And I'm thinking, "Bloody hell, not another one!"

 (Crop circle, depicting mayan Headdress)



 Summer 2009 has been another treasure trove of crop circle formations and they just keep getting better and more interesting.




On the 5th of July, 2009 an awe inspiring Mayan Motif Crop Circle formation was reported at Silbury Hill near Avebury, Wiltshire. This magnificent crop circle resembles a Native American Headdress with a prominent Mayan Motif symbolizing solar flares, coronal mass ejections represented as dots on the feathers of the headdress. It has a zig zag pattern to it ... signature of the feathered serpent, Quetzalcoatl, 'The Radiant One' who is expected to make his return any time now ...





The Native Americans are known for having rather animated headdresses. For them the headdress was not just about aesthetic value. Rather it had deep spiritual significance.

In general, head hair was considered to be the extension of the soul for the Native American Indians. Hence they would use various forms of personal medicine and ornaments to decorate the hair. This was topped off with a truly breathtaking headdress.


(The 2012 Maya Calender : End of 5th sun circle (human civilization) graphic Crop circle.)

Crop circles have been debated and called a hoax. The Above Crop Circle is a depiction of THE (MAYAN CALENDER ?) 

Baffling Crop Circle (Equal Pi)



Is crop circle (pi) from the sky or just another con? This crop circle, reported June 1, 2008, may cause more controversy in the debate whether crop circles are a result of extraterrestrial activity.




"The fact that the Pi decimal point is included (in the 2008 Barbury Castle barley pattern) and there is rounding up to 10 decimal places is to me a little mind boggling!







(Pi = 3.141592654..........IN A CROP CIRCLE)



When it comes to crop circles, a simple pattern is usually enough to grab attention. But this one has had crop circle enthusiasts and experts stumped.

Carved out in a barley paddock, this 50 metre-wide pattern is said to be a pictorial representation of the first 10 digits of pi, one of the most fundamental symbols in mathematics.

Believers in extra-terrestrials could argue it was made by mathematically minded aliens on a field trip to Earth. Skeptics will think it the work of humans with a fondness for figures and a penchant for puzzles.

But whatever its origins, the experts say it is the most complex crop circle ever seen in Britain.



 The Crabwood Alien face (The alien Face holding a message)


The Crabwood Alien face of August 15 was one of the most famous crop pictures in modern history, but no one could really understand its message. As shown in two pictures below, the schematic face of a "Grey alien" was drawn within a large "rectangular box" that contained 60 horizontal lines




"That Rectangular (ENHANCED IMAGE FROM THE THE ALIEN HOLDING THE CIRCLE GLYPH) box is a mathematical Equation"




In order to represent numbers and letters of the alphabet, computers use a set of 128 characters which comprises what is known as the ASCII character set. ASCII stands for American Standard Code for Information Interchange and was devised by the ANSI corporation back in the 1960s. The original ASCII set comprised of 7 bits in order to represent 128 unique characters. However, modern computers use an 8 bit character set which can display 255 different characters. The 'upper' 128 characters are usually reserved for special characters such as accented foreign characters and things like the Euro symbol.

Going back to our spiral of binary digits in the crop formation disc, we obtain an initial grouping of 01000010 01100101 01110111 01100001 01110010 and so on, spiralling out from the centre. (see diagram). We can translate these binary sequences into their decimal equivalent and thus look them up in the ASCII character set to see what letters they correspond to.

Doing this for the whole 'disc' we get the message "Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES. Much PAIN but still time. (Damaged Word). There is GOOD out there.We OPpose DECEPTION. Conduit CLOSING (BELL SOUND)". This was originally decoded by an anonymous visitor to Linda Moulton-Howe's web site.




















(Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES.Much PAIN But Still time.BELIEVE.There is GOOD out there.We oppose DECEPTION.COnduit CLOSING)





 "The universe has made it so that radio is the preferred method for interstellar communication."



Then, in 2001 -- 27 years after that original radio transmission -- an “answer” suddenly appeared in a wheat field in central England …















THEY ANSWERED BACK....... in 2002
















"The above (ON THE LEFT) is the Crop circle (CHILBOLTEN)  depiction written in binary code", it display's a small figure with a large head and arms larger then the legs, it also explains the genetic make up of the creature in the message ( DNA) it appeears to be of a silicon base, and also displays the method of how the message was sent. (ON THE RIGHT IS THE ARECIBO MESSAGE SENT INTO SPACE 1974)









In order to fully understand the message encoded in the transmission, it's essential to understand the binary code. This is actually much simpler than our base 10, decimal system. Whereas in base 10 we count from 1 to 9 and then carry 1 into the 10's column and start again in the units column, until we've got 9 in the 10's column and 9 in the units column. Then we have to carry 1 into the 100's column and start again in the 10's and units columns, and so on and so on.

In binary each column goes up in powers of 2, hence the columns are units, 2's, 4's, 8's, 16's etc. Because we can only deal in 1's and 0's, we rapidly move up through the columns - because as soon as we exceed 1 we carry into the next column.



















The idea of first contact with an alien civilization is certainly something that our science fiction has danced around for as long as man has looked at the stars.  Ongoing surveys continue to demonstrate that as a populace, we are in majority acceptance that there are other forms of Intelligent life in the Universe.  Certainly, among that majority are many who believe that we have been and are being visited by these Extra-Terrestrial Biological and Spiritual Entities.  There is certainly a LOT to support the idea that we are not alone and that we are being visited.  Just looking at our celestial neighbors, we can see the evidence of Extra-terrestrial artifacts.  Many will debate and often debunk the face on Mars and the adjoining Cydonia region ripe with Pyramids; Cities and other geometric features.  Even our own satellite, Luna (more commonly referred to as the Moon) is ripe with artifacts and structures.  As we look at the moons of other planets in the Sol System, we find even more evidence that the "stuff of life" isn't isolated to this one little world.  As we awaken as a fifth world being, we recognize the truths so inherent within our reality.  This awakening is in phases.  The events over the past 100 years have accelerated our transition, which will ultimately lead us to a public first contact. 


"Chilbolton code explained"

So, what about those changes?  To begin with, the first line -- the decimal equivalents of the binary code -- were unchanged from the Arecibo original.  But the atomic numbers of the elements composing the basis of Life had been altered: silicon, an element with an atomic number of 14, was added precisely in the correct sequence -- between oxygen (atomic number 8) and phosphorus (atomic number 15).  This was a most curious and significant additi

"Decoding the Chilbolton Code"

At least one investigator has

already published a remarkable answer to such musings: a plausible “alien” DNA chemistry, based on a careful tally of the information in the glyph, utilizing a silicon-oxygen tetrahedral molecule in place of the phosphate in our DNA (graphic, below).





The MOON has been some what of a debate since we first looked up to the HEAVENS. THE QUESTION of did we land on the MOON or DIDNT we has been a MAJOR debate back and forward with both sides presenting there SO CALLED EVIDENCE, the Following VIDS are some of those debates.


"Yes, they went to the Moon, and yes, they also lied about it.

And why did they need to lie? In order to hide the truth about what is REALLY up there."






DETAIL THEY DIDNT WANT YOU TO SEE..... houston... we have no stars in the background....roger that.


Apollo 11 Moon Landing Rare Color Footage NASA

 Banned in America: Proof of Fake Moon landing


Alien Spaceship on The Moon Flyover Before Landing Apollo 20



Moon Rising Part 1

 "Nasa astronauts discussing forbiden information you were never meant to know"


"The Moons Anomalies"

"What NASA never wants you to see" 


Freddy Jackson


Freddy Jackson was a mechanic in the Royal Air Force in World War I. Freddy Jackson’s squadron served on board the H.M.S. Daedalus. Freddy Jackson was killed in 1919 when an airplane propeller hit him. Two days later when the squadron assembled for a group photo, Freddy Jackson faithfully showed up, grinning behind the ear of a fellow comrade. Guess nobody bothered to tell Freddy Jackson that he was dead. His face was widely recognized in this photo by members of the squadron.

Mrs. Mabel Chinnery was visiting the grave of her mother one day in 1959. She had brought along her camera to take photographs of the grave site. After snapping a few shots of her mother's gravestone, she took an impromptu photo of her husband, who was waiting alone in the car. At least the Chinnerys' thought he was alone.



When the film was developed, the couple was more than surprised to see a figure wearing glasses sitting in the back seat of the car. Mrs. Chinnery immediately recognized the image of her mother – the woman whose grave they had visited on that day. A photographic expert who examined the print determined that the image of the woman was neither a reflection nor a double exposure. "
I stake my reputation on the fact that the picture is genuine," he testified.






PROF John Searl SEG Free Energy Magnet GeneratorLOWN



 bigfoot patterson


Area 51 alien interview

 CNN Larry King Live  Space Alien Caught On Tape pt1

There have been many EARTH like planet's found.... why are they not being made public ?

Gliese 581 C





The 12th planet


 Nibiru caught on SOHO,







 Pictures were taken on 5-12-2009 about 5 mins apart.

 April 25, 2009


 "The day the world changed"


World Trade Center

 Pentagon LIES


The pentagon Attack

Like most people, on September 11th 2001

 I believed the official story about the terror attacks. It took me almost three years to become a skeptic. The major issue that led me finally to question the official accounts was the manner of the collapse of the Twin Towers. After watching a one-hour critical video in the summer of 2004 (see below) I decided to look into the question of whether the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by pre-planned demolition charges. In due course, as I researched the issue in books, video and the Internet, I become convinced that the terrible events of that day were planned and executed by the Bush administration. I saw no way out of Jim Hoffman’s theory that if the WTC Towers were brought down by controlled demolition, then Osama Bin Laden couldn’t have been responsible.[1]

Finally, to complete my conversion, about a year later, I read an article by Australian researcher Gerard Holmgren, called "Manufactured Terrorism,"[2] which propounded what seemed an incredible theory: that no large passenger jets were used in any of the 9/11 attacks, including New York City. Later I read yet another key article supporting the same No Planes Theory (NPT), this one by Morgan Reynolds[3], former Chief Economist at the U.S. Department of Labor 2001-2002. I soon became an advocate of the NPT, a tiny subset of the 9/11-truth movement.


On the day of 9/11 I experienced a heavy dose of the intended shock and awe when I watched in real time the collapses of the Twin Towers. Shortly after 9:03 a.m. I heard on the radio that there was video of a big passenger plane hitting the South Tower and I was glued to the TV for the next couple of hours.

Later I was relieved to learn that the government had quickly identified the perpetrators -– the story was that they were Islamic extremists[4]. It wasn’t much of a stretch for me to imagine that the motive for the attacks was revenge mainly for U.S./Israeli policies in the Middle East. The thought that my government, specifically the Bush-Cheney administration, might be the ones who planned and executed the attacks didn’t enter my mind, nor would such an outrageous unthinkable idea seem to me for many months within the realm of possibility.

As I watched the World Trade Center towers collapse, I couldn’t help thinking how surprising and fortunate it was that they came straight down in their own footprint instead of falling horizontally into the densely built up neighborhood of lower Manhattan when the destruction in lives and property would have been vastly magnified.

Years later, I realized that that was a very vulnerable moment. All that it might have required for me to become an instant 9/11 skeptic was learn that high rise steel framed buildings never come down at the speed of gravity and in their own footprints except during an earthquake or when previous arrangements have been made for them to collapse through controlled demolition. Dan Rather, CBS TV’s venerable news anchor as he watched the collapse of WTC Building 7 at 5:20 p.m. said it was "reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before when a building was destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down."[5] But I didn’t happen to be watching television at that hour and in course of the day’s traumatic events, I don’t recall paying much attention to Building 7. I’m not sure that I even knew that Building 7 collapsed until I began my research in 2004.

The strange collapse of the Twin Towers

There can’t simultaneously be both high resistance—causing grinding of the concrete into dust—and negligible resistance allowing a fall at the same speed as through air.

Only the input of extra energyan orchestrated demolition, explains the simultaneous presence of both factors. – Gerard Holmgren

It wasn’t until I saw video of some of the speakers at a 9/11 conference held some weeks earlier in Canada. At that conference, persuasive evidence was presented that contradicted the official story, which claims that the towers collapsed as a result of the combination of plane crashes and the resultant fires.

One talk that I found most compelling was by computer engineer Jim Hoffman who has written widely on the World Trade Center collapses. From Hoffman and others I learned that according to the laws of physics, even the combined impact of the "planes" and the resultant fires could not have caused the collapses and explosions.

The strongest smallest fire in history

In Hoffman’s presentation and in other videos, articles and books, it was pointed out that never before or since had steel framed buildings been brought down by fire, even in cases where the fires were much hotter and burned much longer.

For example, the One Meridian Plaza fire in Philadelphia in 1991 burned for 18 hours and was described by local officials as

the most significant fire in this century

The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of spandrel panel connections. Despite the severity and duration of the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the building collapsed…

All other cases of large fires in steel framed buildings were characterized by extensive window breakage, large areas of emergent flames and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.[6]

Notice small fires to several floors, steel structure intact.

David Ray Griffin, retired professor of Religion and Theology, a popular 9/11 author, writes that even a supporter of the official story, Thomas Eager, professor of materials engineering at MIT, says that the impact of the planes would NOT have been sufficient to bring down the Towers because "the number of columns lost on the initial impact was not large and the loads were shifted to the remaining columns in this highly redundant structure."[7]

I also learned that airplane fuel burns at only 800 degrees F, not nearly hot enough to seriously stress steel, which melts at 2700 degrees F in optimum conditions. Hoffman notes that steel is an excellent conductor of heat so that even if the steel beams in the immediate area of the crash were stressed, the heat would have been spread throughout the vast heat sink that comprised the 236 steel beams in the perimeter and the 47 steel beams built into the core of the building.

Thomas Eager asserts that the steel in the Towers could have collapsed if it had lost only 80% of its strength. Eager believes this happened since the fires reached 1300 F. But Griffin argues that for this amount of heat, the fires would have to very big and it would have to be applied to a steel beam for a considerable amount of time. (NPH, p. 14) The available evidence suggests that the fires were small and didn’t burn for long. Griffin cites the photos in researcher Eric Hufschmid’s book, Painful Questions[8] of the small fires evident in the both Towers, which generated a great amount of heat but were not long lasting because the fuel was quickly burned up. Hufschmid’s photos show that the spectacular flames vanished quickly and then the fire remained restricted to one area of the Tower and slowly diminished. The fires were localized and of short duration. (NPH, pp. 14-15) Griffin cites Hufschmid‘s question: How could a fire produce such incredible quantities of heat that it could destroy a steel building, while incapable of spreading beyond its initial starting location? The photos show that not even one floor in the South Tower was above the ignition temperature of plastic and paper!" The fire was not even powerful enough to crack glass windows! (NPH, p. 211, fn. 52)

Griffin tackles one of the persistent misunderstandings about the Twin Tower fires. He writes that defenders of the official theory suggest that the Twin Towers were special in the sense that the fire did not have to heat all the steel by spreading throughout the floors. The culprits were the "angle clips" which "held the floor joists between the columns on the perimeter wall and the core structure," and which, he says, were not designed to hold five times their normal load. According to this "zipper" version of the truss theory, once angle clips failed in one area, it put extra load on other angle clips and then it unzipped around the building on that floor in a matter of seconds and led to a domino effect which caused the buildings to collapse within ten seconds. Something like this theory was endorsed in the FEMA report, which spoke of a "pancake-type of collapse of successive floors." (NPH, pp. 15-16)

But Griffin finds that there are problems with this account. First the amount of heat required to make the steel very hot would seem to require more heat than was present, especially in the South Tower.

2nd Griffin cites Hufschmid who writes, "In order for a floor to fall, hundreds of joints had to break almost simultaneously on 236 exterior columns and 47 core columns."

3rd Eagar’s theory of the speed of the collapse – nearly at free fall speed--doesn’t take into account the problem of resistance. "Can we really believe that the upper part of the buildings encountered virtually no resistance from the lower parts?" How "could the debris crush 100 steel and concrete floors while falling as fast as objects fall through air?"

4th Eager’s and other versions of the official account cannot do justice to the total collapse of the towers, resulting in a pile that "was only a few stories high." Such theories don’t explain the collapse of the steel core of the buildings.

5th The official story doesn’t explain why the South Tower collapsed first. Since it would take considerable time for fire to heat steel to its own temperature, all things equal, the South Tower, which was struck 17 minutes later than the North Tower, should have collapsed later, not 29 minutes earlier. This is even more surprising since the fires in the South Tower were much smaller. This "reversal of expectations suggests that the collapse of these buildings was caused by something other than the fires." (NPH, p. 17)

Controlled demolition accounts for all the facts discussed thus far. Peter Meyer, the author of a book on the WTC demolition, explained the reason the collapse was so total and so rapid. He theorized that the bases of the steel columns were shattered at the bedrock. "With those bases obliterated, and the supporting steel columns shattered by explosions at various levels…the upper floors lost all support and collapsed to ground level in about 10 seconds." (NPH, p. 18)

Griffin goes on to list additional facts that seem explainable only by the demolition theory.

Each collapse produced a lot of fine dust. Where does the energy come from to turn all this reinforced concrete into dust? Hufschmid adds that photos show only "a few small pieces of concrete" which means that virtually every piece of concrete "shattered into dust." Where did the energy come from? Similarly, by what means was very fine concrete dust ejected from the top of the building very early in the collapse. Hufschmid adds that even concrete slabs hitting the ground at free fall speed would not be pulverized. That would require explosives. (NPH, p. 18)

Explosion Not Collapse

Evidence of the use of explosives can be seen in that the Towers didn’t fall straight down, they exploded.

These pictures depict timing charges going off at different levels in the building to reduce the structural strength.

Huge amounts of powder was "ejected horizontally from the building with such force that the buildings were surrounded by enormous dust clouds that were perhaps three times the width of the buildings themselves."

Could any other power besides explosives turn concrete into powder and then eject it horizontally? And "some of the photographs show rather large pieces of the tower were thrown out 150 feet or more." (NPH, pp. 18-19)

Gerard Holmgren also points to the apparent floor-by-floor explosion (not collapse) of the Twin Towers and explains some of the physics involved. He finds that the conversion of the Towers into " a free falling collection of disconnected rubble," is possible only through "coordinated… demolition techniques." And:

As if that isn’t enough, we have the resistance paradox. This phrase has been coined to describe the fact that not only did the towers fall at a speed, which indicates negligible resistance, but at the same time they ground themselves into fine dust while still standing.

This is impossible under the law of conservation of energy. If one were to postulate that somehow the entire building was—without any planning—miraculously and symmetrically disembodied, enabling it to fall without resistance, then it leaves nothing to explain the pulverization of the concrete. Such pulverization can only come from a high resistance collision. On the other hand, if you postulate extreme collision forces within the falling building, grinding the falling concrete into fine dust on its way down, then there is nothing to explain the resistance free fall of the speed. There can’t simultaneously be both high resistance—causing grinding of the concrete into dust—and negligible resistance allowing a fall at the same speed as through air. Only the input of extra energy—an orchestrated demolition, explains the simultaneous presence of both factors.[9]

The Pentagon Strike

"Notice no plane Wreckage in or around the Pentagon"

This is what is left behind when a plane crashes

Among the dozens of anomalies and unanswered questions pertaining to the attack on the Pentagon, researchers emphasize the difficulty in believing that no positive action was taken before 9:37 a.m. to protect the most well guarded facility on the planet from an attack by a Boeing 757 passenger plane.

Both Griffin and Holmgren point to the three different versions of the government’s official story, none of which explained why there were no timely interceptions of the four alleged passenger jets.[10]The official story might have gained far less currency if for example the media had informed the public that military jet interceptions of wayward aircraft are routine and occur more than a hundred times a year.[11]

Morgan Reynolds finds a "gaping hole in the government theory" of how the Pentagon was struck by a Boeing 757 and he reproduces a helpful diagram. Reynolds finds that

the Pentagon gash is too small both vertically and horizontally. A Boeing 757’s tail is 40 feet tall with landing gear up while the maximum height of the hole in the Pentagon could not have been 30 feet tall (two stories). The width of the hole was less than 20 feet before the façade collapsed, and windows above the impact hole were intact. The largest width claimed for the hole is 65 feet—more like 52 feet according to photographic expert Jack White—and that was after the façade collapsed, not upon impact. The 757wingspan is 125 feet, about twice the width of the post-façade-collapse hole. The Puny Pentagon Hole (PPH) falsifies the government’s "a-Boeing-757-hit-the-Pentagon" story. It is not a close call.


Did a 757 Hit the Pentagon

"The size of the hole created by the attack on the Pentagon"

Could a Plane fit ?


Did a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9-11

First let's start with the factual information available on hand.

The 757-200
As we can see from the freely available information for the Boeing 757 (from the Boeing website). The 757 is a midsized commercial airliner designed for short haul and medium haul routes (Medium Range Transport (MR-TR)), although since its release, and the subsequent discovery of the Wake Vortex it leaves behind the FAA has classified the 757 as a "Heavy" aircraft; the FAA places the 757 in the Geometric Design Classification IV, and an ATC Operation Class C.
The 757-200 dimensions:
Tail Height: 44 ft 6 in (13.6m)
Length: 155 ft 3 in (47.32m)
Wingspan: 124 ft 10 in (38.05m)
Body Exterior Width: 12 ft 4 in (3.7m)
Fuel Capacity: 11,489 us gal (43,490l / 43,490kg)
Maximum Takeoff weight: 255,000lb (115,680kg)
Typical Cruise Speed: 0.80 Mach (573.6mph / 956kmh)
Engines used on a 757: Two 166.4kN (37,400lb) Rolls-Royce RB211-535C turbofans, or 178.8kN (40,200lb) RB211-535E4s, or 193.5kN (43,500lb) RB211-535E4-Bs, or 162.8kN (36,600lb) Pratt & Whitney PW2037s, or two 178.4kN (40,100lb) PW2040s, or 189.5kN (42,600lb) PW2043s.
Auxiliary Power Unit: Honeywell GTCP331-200

left portion:     right portion:      (height and width notation to graphic added by me)

Next, let's look at the Pentagon.

The Pentagon

The Pentagon was designed in the early 40's and was completed in only 16 months on Jan 14, 1943. The shortages of materials required for war production raised many design and construction problems. The use of reinforced concrete in lieu of formed steel for the building made possible a saving of 43,000 tons of steel, more than enough to build a battleship. The use of concrete ramps rather than elevators further reduced steel requirements. Drainage pipes were concrete; ducts were fiber, interior doors were wood. An unusual wall design - concrete spandrels carried to window sill level - eliminated many miles of through-wall copper flashing.

 On September 11, when an American Airlines Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon, home of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), about 20,000 people were at work in this, the largest office building in the world. Yet according to the DoD casualty update on October 1, only 125 Pentagon employees were killed along with the 64 from the fated airliner. 

The exterior walls had been reinforced with steel beams and columns, bolted where they met at each floor. Some of these reinforced walls very near the point of impact remained in place for a half hour before collapsing, allowing uncounted hundreds to escape. "Had we not undertaken this effort," said Evey at a Press briefing on september 25,"this could have been much, much worse."

Now, I'm sure everyone can agree that the above information is a matter of public record, and none of it is incorrect, altered, or misquoted in any way to support either side of the case. It is all merely factual information that we will refer to in the following sections.

 Looking At the Big Picture

From facts contained above, we can all agree that:

·  The length of the outside wall on any side of the pentagon is 921 feet.

·  The wingspan of a 757 is 124 feet 10 inches.

·  Now, everyone can agree that 921/125= roughly 7.4 right?

Given the size of the 757, and the size of the Pentagon, the damaged area fits in perfectly with the dimensions of both the aircraft and the building.

"Take another look at the hole created by the attack on the Pentagon"

Ask Yourself, Where is the Plane ?


This is a close up of the damage created by the Pentagon attack

The top of the hole in the middle of the white box is at the same level as the top of the windows of the second floor, or about 23-25 feet from ground. The three windows above this are the windows of the third floor. The foam covered window to the top right is the fourth floor. As noted by the Pentagon report, this area (above the center hole) is where the tail should have struck, but there is no evidence of any damage that we would expect from such an impact. What's more, the tail fin was definitely not dropped on the lawn along with the two 6 TON engines.


The tail fin of a Boeing 757 did not strike this area.

What does that suggest?

That a Boeing 757 was not involved in the attack.


The Pentagon footage released showing the attack

"Lets play spot the Plane"

Reynolds also points to some of the impossible physics that would have had to transpire had flight AA77 struck the Pentagon in accord with the official story. Simply put, no passenger jet could have flown at ground level at top speed because the resultant air pressure acting on the wings would have thrown the plane wildly off course even with the most experienced of pilots.

A 757 flying a nearly flat flight profile (no dive) at 500+ mph as alleged could not hit the Pentagon’s ground floor because of an extremely powerful ground effect cushion beneath it. At high speeds, the highly energized wing-tip vortices and huge downwash sheet of a 200,000-lb. airliner make it physically impossible to get closer to the ground than one-half wingspan or about 60’ in this case. The physical forces of the compressible gas called air, in other words, stirred by a high-speed 757 traveling flat near the ground make it impossible to land it at high speed. An aeronautical engineer proves this proposition in an article at , and he invites other engineers and pilots to prove him wrong. Very few pilots have experienced the aerodynamic effects in this rare flight domain because they normally only get this close to the ground during landing at low speeds. Highly wing-loaded aircraft like the Global Hawk or B1-B can land at high speed but not lightly wing-loaded aircraft like the 757. In addition, a ground-hugging 757 spewing a 100,000-lb. thrust jetblast behind it would have blown trailer trucks and people away, phenomena absent in the flight path (see the DVD " Loose change" for an example). Irrefutable physics falsifies the Pentagon’s lies.

No Planes In D.C. or in PA...

Where is the plane ?

There are so many unanswered questions related to the alleged crash of a Boeing 757 flying into the Pentagon that perhaps a majority of the 9/11 research community don’t believe that a Big Boeing was involved in that attack. Many skeptics also don’t believe there is any evidence of a passenger jet plane at the alleged crash site in Shanksville, PA.Thus for the NPT to be more favorably viewed by the 9/11 research community it remains only to rule out that passenger jets were used to crash into the Twin Towers. Morgan Reynolds helpfully sets the stage.

The one towering fact is that the 9-11 research community can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that professional demolition brought down the three trade center buildings—WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7. These unprecedented collapses in steel-framed skyscrapers bear all the earmarks of demolition—virtual free fall speed of collapse, pulverization of concrete, eyewitness testimony of explosions, film and photographic evidence of explosions, and so on. The jetliner attacks, by contrast, might be described as diversions that facilitated and covered the primary attacks via demolition, a familiar tactic in terrorist attacks.

Morgan Reynolds argues that it is important to address the No Planes Theory despite objections by many, evidently the majority of the 9/11-Truth movement, that such questions will prove a "sideshow" or a "distraction" from "an uncompromising focus on the WTC demolitions."

Reynolds reminds us that the official story that "young Arabs hijacked specific flights and crashed them is a vital component of the official fiction."

New, rational understanding about the plane stories would have great value, and that probably explains the intense resistance to such scrutiny. Questions and answers about each plane crash matter for at least three reasons:

* If the perpetrators get away with the plane hoaxes, it encourages more audacious, blood-soaked scams

* The key to acquiescence in the government’s war on terror and global domination project is public belief in Arab hi-jacked airliners and crashes

* Exposure of airplane lies expands the proof that government committed the 9/11 atrocities 

Gerard Holmgren: No planes, no hijackers

In order to provide meaningful context to his discussion of problems with the official story about 19 Arab hijackers, Holmgren discusses the inexplicable movements and the apparent inaction and disinterest of President Bush and Acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Richard Myers, during the attacks; the almost instant naming of Osama bin Laden as the culprit despite claims by the U.S. that they were taken completely by surprise; the immediate threat to invade Afghanistan when it turned out the decision to do so had already been made by July 2001 and the plans were on Bush’s desk by Sept 9; and the urban myth that Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attacks.

Among other things, Holmgren wonders how credible it can be that the FBI so quickly identified 19 Arab hijackers within only a few days. He also cites their difficult to believe allegation that some of hijackers’ passports and suicide notes were found at the crash scenes. "In another miraculous stroke of good luck," Holmgren writes, "the luggage of the supposed ringleader, Mohammad Atta, was "fortuitously left behind at Logan airport" with instructions to his fellow conspirators.

Holmgren opines that it must have been embarrassing for the FBI when some of the hijackers began turning up alive and protesting their innocence. "And even more embarrassing when the passenger lists provided by the airlines did not contain a single Arabic name," and he details other related impossibilities, improbabilities and coincidences, including an admission by the FBI (later apparently effectively recanted) that "they actually had no idea who hijackers were." To this day, the FBI list of the 19 hijackers remains unchanged.

Among the reasons that Holmgren concludes that there weren’t any hijackings or hijackers was that in not one of the four alleged hijackings did any of the crew punch in the four digit hijacking code to alert Air Traffic Control. Holmgren also wonders why there was no distress call from Flight AA 11 (North Tower hit) when there was an alleged 25-minute standoff, including shooting and stabbing of passengers. Another anomaly from that alleged flight is that "the timeline of the alleged phone call indicates that the plane had already turned off course before the hijackers got into the cockpit."

No verifiable wreckage at the Pentagon

Holmgren continues his line of argument by claiming that the plane that we saw on TV was "an elaborate illusion." Holmgren begins his analysis of the planes with AA77, the plane supposedly involved in the Pentagon attack. He suggests that the reason that the government has not produced clear and undisputable video evidence of a big passenger plane striking the Pentagon is because it never happened. From photos of the aftermath he can find no evidence of wreckage of such a plane: "no wings, no tail, no protruding fuselage." Holmgren also reminds us that early reports on 9/11/01 said that a truck bomb caused the damage to the Pentagon. The "witness reports are confused and contradictory and provide no confirmation of a large plane hitting the building."(Holmgren’s emphasis)


BTS Data reveal no Passenger Planes Destroyed on 9/11

If the subject were not so controversial, one might assume that a very powerful blow to the story of four hijacked airplanes on 9/11 would be Holmgren’s discovery that two of the four flights connected to that day’s events did not exist and the other two alleged participating aircraft were not destroyed until four years later. As Holmgren writes, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) keeps detailed records of flight times, tail numbers, taxi out times, wheels off times, and so on for every scheduled flight from a U.S. airport, in part for liability insurance considerations. Holmgren found that the original BTS records of take offs that day did not list flights for AA77 (Pentagon crash) and AA11 (North Tower, the first hit).

Of the first hit on the WTC North Tower at 8:46, Holmgren notes that when one looks closely at the video (which wasn’t broadcast until 16 hours later "when the official story of four large planes had already been put into the public’s mind") all one can see is "a brief flash and then the explosion." Holmgren claims that whatever the object is, it "is certainly not a Boeing 767 or any kind of large passenger jet." The object is "way too small. It dive bombs into the tower in a manner which would appear to [be] impossible for a large airliner." Although, he writes, "the natural tendency is to think it is just too fast to see on the video…a frame by frame enlarged analysis…shows a very strange looking object, or possibly several objects flying in close formation. A pulsating blob or group of blobs is probably the best description.

Holmgren argues that the passenger lists seem to be fabricated "because there are impossible contradictions between the lists published by different media outlets…." Nor, he claims, are there any reliable witnesses to support a large jet of the first strike. "All early reports say that it was a small plane or missile," and others who say they simply didn’t see any plane. According to Holmgren, the first strike became a "large plane after people saw the second strike live on TV, leading to the assumption that the first strike had been the same thing," and after American Airlines declared that it had lost AA11 in the crash.

The Illusion -- Live on TV

Holmgren then deconstructs the "the South Tower strike – the second hit, the one shown live on TV" and acknowledges that superficially it certainly appears to be a large jet." Yet, he argues, "a close examination reveals that it is not a real plane." To support this assertion Holmgren provides a score of links to the work of researchers Rosalee Grable (aka Webfairy), Nico Haupt, Morgan Reynolds, Ivan Amato and his own supporting articles.

Holmgren finds that the plane shown on TV is not real because it "shows impossible physical characteristics and behavior." The argument that I find most convincing and easiest to understand is his claim that one can see in a frame-by-frame analysis that the alleged plane "passes through the wall like a ghost without making a hole and without breaking off any parts." Holmgren concludes that the plane is "simply a cartoon, which has been animated into the footage."

According to Holmgren, despite popular misconceptions that many real time videos of the plane striking the South Tower exist, there was only one live video of this plane and that video did not show it hitting the building, but rather it shows the plane passing behind the building "giving the impression that it impacted the hidden face," an effect easily achieved "with commercially available real time animation technology. The other videos, which seem… to show the plane actually hitting the building did not appear until hours later."

Holmgren makes short work of flight UA 93, the one alleged to have crashed in Shanksville, PA. This was also "a bona fide flight, but the plane –N591UA – was also still registered as valid for more than four years after Sept 11…The alleged crash site in Pennsylvania shows absolutely no evidence of a plane crash."

To drive home his point that no planes were involved in the 9/11 attacks, Holmgren makes much of the lack of evidence of any wreckage of any of the four planes. He suggests that if real planes had crashed, it would be an easy matter for the government to produce some portion of the tons of normally identifiable wreckage.

Likewise Morgan Reynolds finds that the most obvious defect of the official story is an absence or near absence of conventional airplane wreckage.

Government could have ended controversy over planes long ago by allowing independent investigators to examine part numbers and compare them to each plane’s maintenance logbook. This did not happen following the 9/11 crashes. Government has not produced a single airplane part by serial number for independent corroboration.

Of the two Boeing 767’s, which vanished into the Twin Towers, Reynolds asks:

How could two large wide-bodied aluminum jetliners penetrate massive steel towers and disappear with no deceleration visible, no plane wreckage visible in gashes and none knocked to the ground below the impact zone?

Reynolds finds a "stunning lack of evidence" that "no confirmed debris exists from two alleged 767 high speed crashes into skyscrapers within 17 minutes of each other. Furthermore Reynolds finds that

physics rejects any theory that posits an invincible airplane (a plane remaining intact after an abrupt collision with a steel skyscraper) that also disintegrates (flimsy) in the next instant in the same general physical environment (temperature, etc.)…. (my emphasis)

Another problem says Reynolds is that the maximum spread across the north tower hole is 126 feet and the south tower is only 103 feet, opening insufficient to accommodate a 767 wingspan of 156 feet." "Wings with momentum do not "fold back onto themselves" in order to slip through an undersized hole along with the fuselage." Summing up this line of argument, Reynolds writes:

defenders of the 767 theory want their cake and eat it too: supposedly powerful 767s easily penetrated steel walls and floors yet identically crumbled within a fraction of a second and vanished inside despite huge fuselage length and wingspan ¾ the length of a tower wall. Both 767s were never seen again from any side of either tower, a dazzling combination of imposing strength and fragility within a tenth of a second.

Holmgren – Why they didn’t use planes

In his article on "Why they didn’t use planes," Holmgren suggests that barring an independent investigation, it is impossible to do justice to the question. Yet he thinks it may be instructive to outline some of the thinking that could have gone into planning the operation. In Holmgren’s view, the perpetrators had to weigh the dangers inherent in their two main options: either use real passenger planes or use missiles (or some other similar method or combination of methods of creating an explosion) and convince people that the missiles were planes.

In the missile-not-planes scenario, Holmgren suggests that there are two things that could go wrong. The first problem is that witnesses would say (as they did in reality) that they didn’t see a plane involved in the first strike. Holmgren suggests that this problem was easily countered in part because there was only an 18-minute window between the first hit at 8:46 and the second at 9:03 when everyone saw "a big jet live on TV." Most witnesses who said they didn’t see a plane strike the North Tower were effectively intimidated or ignored.

According to Holmgren, in the brief period between the two strikes, there was only one witness who said he saw a large jet strike the North Tower, "and that just happened to be the vice prez of CNN…" Thus the problem of "contrary witnesses [turned out to be] a minor inconvenience…easily overcome with good planning."

The other problem that Holmgren imagines to the missile scenario is that someone "might look at the videos and see what’s actually there. Which is exactly what Rosalee [Grable, aka Webfairy] has done." Although the planners of the attack "wouldn’t be happy with the groundswell of awareness which Rosalee has kick-started" nevertheless this seems "easily manageable" compared to issues arising out of using real jets.

Problems with using real planes

Holmgren develops his discussion of the problems with using real jets with the two sub choices of piloting them with suicide pilots or piloting the jets by remote control. Some of the "obvious…and monstrous difficulties" of using real pilots are not difficult to imagine. What if, for example, the Arab pilots haven’t been trained to fly jets? Or if they haven’t been trained to fly jets without responding to ground control? What if they don’t wake up in time to make their flights? Eric Hufschmid, an advocate of the theory that the passenger jets were piloted by remote control, asks similar questions: "What if the hijackers decide to switch from hitting the World Trade Center to hitting the U.S. Capitol…or they miss the towers and hit some other building?"

Holmgren takes up the many problems with the remote control theory. This theory he suggests splits into the two options of "crashing a plane with passengers aboard or with no passengers aboard." According to Holmgren, both "possibilities create potentially insurmountable problems with the cover up."

A remotely controlled plane might "hit some other building, just clip its wing on the tower and crash into the streets or cause a cascade of damage on other non-targeted buildings, miss altogether and finish up in the Hudson," etc.

Holmgren suggests that "Even the smallest increase in risk of the target not being hit properly would be completely unacceptable, given the easily manageable nature of any problems associated with the alternative [missile] scenario." According to Holmgren, "missing the target is only the beginning…What about the aftermath?"

For example, an unacceptable outcome would be if the plane missed or slightly missed its target and it was found that there were no passengers. Similarly if there were passengers and one or more survived to tell their story. Even if no passengers survived, innocent rescue workers might arrive before the cover up crew and discover and release forensic evidence inimical to the cover story. Any of these outcomes would be "Far worse than anything a few witnesses could say in the 18 minutes between the two tower strikes…. In addition, real planes leave real wreckage… which means real flight recorder boxes to be found and more stuff to hush up…"

Holmgren concludes with some of the common sense notions familiar to veterans of TV police procedurals.

In committing a crime, the idea is to leave as little mess as possible, because every bit of mess is a potential clue. Even in the event of a successfully targeted crash, real aircraft, scattering wreckage and bodies everywhere creates an enormous amount of mess to cover up compared to the relatively neat problem of a few witnesses and a few conspiracy nuts trying to tell people what the video shows.

The problems of the real plane scenario are enormously compounded by the possibility of a botched crash, which itself is a significantly increased risk when using big lumbering jets not specifically designed for that task as opposed to precision weaponry which is far more reliable.

Not many plane crash victims

A frequently asked and presently unanswerable question is: what happened to the passengers and crew of the four passenger jets that were supposed to have crashed? While very little information about their deaths has surfaced there is evidence that there were fewer victims than has been reported.

NY based researcher Vincent Sammartino claims that the government seems to have faked the number of plane victims and also faked the number who claimed victim compensation.According to Sammartino, of the 266 official names of passengers and crew who were supposed to have died in the four passenger jets, only 52 names have appeared on the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), a privately owned website not affiliated with the Social Security Administration. According to Sammartino, of the 52 listed as dead in the SSDI, which has an accuracy rate of about 83%, only 11 of the family members have claimed victim compensation (not counting 9/11 plane crash widow, Ellen Mariani, who has pointedly refused compensation).

Sammartino writes that his research was spurred in part because of a radio interview he heard with Ms. Mariani and her lawyer in which they spoke of their inability to locate other family members of the purported plane passengers.

If Sammartino’s figures are closer to reality than official reports, the discrepancies also go some way to advancing the NPT. If no planes were involved in the 9/11 attacks, and if Holmgren is right that Flights 11 and 77 did not fly that day (and Flights 93 and 175 did not crash that day), then it might have been easier for the terrorists to have diverted and perhaps disposed of merely 50-60 victims rather than many more bodies.

Thus the NPT helps us to advance, as Holmgren suggests, a combination missile, and preplanned explosives theory to explain the explosions and fires at the Twin Towers and the Pentagon and the lack of any big passenger plane evidence at those sites. It also helps to explain why relatively few "plane crash" victims have come forward. Evidence also indicates that that no big passenger plane (or any other plane) crashed in Shanksville, PA. The episode may have been cooked up simply for purposes of distraction.

Occam’s Razor

As an independent researcher with little at stake in any particular theory, it has been relatively easy for me to follow the NPT evidence where it leads. I have joined the No Planes group because it seems to me most in conformity with Occam’s Razor, the least complex theory that accounts for the available data.

Over and above scores of non-passenger plane related 9/11 anomalies, the NPT seems to provide a common sense explanation for many of the unanswered questions and inconsistencies. For example, the NPT explains:

  1. why government BTS records show that two of the four planes never took off that day and two others were not decommissioned until four years later.
  2. why the government has refused (or been unable) to present "a single airplane part by serial number for independent corroboration," and why there is no confirmed debris of any of the alleged four planes, so that all of them have disappeared without a trace;
  3. why the passenger lists are phony; why no Arabic names are on any of the passenger lists; and why there are remarkably few alleged plane victims’ families requesting compensation
  4. why several of the purported hijackers have turned up alive and why the government apparently felt it necessary to produce such unpersuasive evidence as hijacker passports, training manuals, etc.
  5. why in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, the government claimed that there were terror cells operating in at least 40 states but hasn’t produced even one untainted terror cell in the last five years.
  6. why there is no reliable video of the Pentagon and the NYC Twin Tower attacks. In the case of the Pentagon video released by the government first as photo stills and then as video, no plane is in evidence; nor would it be possible for a big passenger jet to come in at ground level at high speed.
  7. why there was no air cover in NYC or in Washington, D.C. until after the Pentagon attack at 9:37. If there were no hijacked planes there would have been no need for interceptions.
  8. why there are no credible witnesses to ANY of the alleged four planes.
  9. why the authorities destroyed the tapes of the flight controllers’ recollections of the events of that day. Those tapes might contain evidence that flights 11 and 77 did not take off that day and that 175 and 93 did not crash.
  10. why ALL the cell phone calls were fabricated including the iconic "Let’s Roll," call as well as the Ted Olson-Barbara Olson exchange.

Arab extremists – A comfortable image

One reason for the success of the official story seems to be that many are comfortable with the meme that Osama Bin Laden and 19 Islamic extremists were responsible for the terror on 9/11.

The cultural and political tropes induced by the half century long Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the wider Arab-Israeli conflict have conditioned many in the West to accept the notion of Muslim fanatics willing and capable of suicide attacks on the U.S. homeland. Pro Israeli sentiment reaches deep into the grassroots which is constantly fortified by powerful public relations campaigns of pro-Zionist pressure groups and their academic, political and media supporters. In addition, the security and intelligence services upon the demise of the Soviet Union, substituted Islamic terrorism as a means of justifying their existence and maintaining the national security state a la Orwell. Thus a perfect storm of dominant forces continues to impose the notion of Muslim responsibility for 9/11 terror. Once the government identified the perpetrators on the morning of 9/11, it became an uphill task to convince people to take contrary evidence seriously.

Much of the reluctance to give up on the notion of Muslim terrorists also seems to pervade elements of the 9/11-research community. Despite the lack of any independently verifiable evidence of Arab suicide bombers, many appear to prefer to hold onto this meme perhaps because they also find at least a grain of truth in the stereotype of Islamic fanatics.

But perhaps an even stronger motive for insisting on planes in NYC lies in the fear of many 9/11 skeptics that the image of a plane crashing into the South Tower is so convincing that advocating the NPT would bring discredit on the 911 Truth community. As Professor James Fetzer, a well known 9/11 activist has put it: Even if they (the advocates of NPT) are right, "it hurts the movement." Many feel that there is so much evidence of government complicity beyond the issue of big passenger jets that diverting attention to the one thing most people believe that they "saw" is not to our tactical and strategic advantage.

Yet, in one sense the battle has already been won: the inconsistencies and absurdities of the official story are such that a July 2006 poll by Scripps News Service indicated that 36% of Americans -– about 72 million people –- suspect that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop them. Doubtless, as time goes on, more will gather to the cause as they learn of contrary evidence.

But to translate these millions of people into effective political action that would dramatically revise the official story would require a revolution – one that hasn’t yet happened, for example, with regard to the assassinations four decades ago of JFK, MLK, and RFK. Revolutions sometimes happen but they tend to be rare because they require a confluence of difficult to manufacture elements including inspired leadership, and extraordinary outside circumstances.

It’s hard to imagine the kind of revolution that would be necessary to pry open the files and reveal the "deep politics," the secret government, and their black operations and their false flags that are the staple of elements of the security and intelligence services. Elements of the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and military intelligence have worked more or less closely with the various post-WWII U.S. administrations. On one extreme would be the case of JFK, who seems to have been assassinated by them and on the other the Reagan, Bush I and II administrations, which work closely with them.

Meanwhile, it may be better to view the struggle for justice as a long term one and coalesce on a strategy that places the evidence first and foremost. As Gerard Holmgren has emphasized, the 9/11-Truth movement should stand for truth above all. One notable advantage of concentrating on the evidence is that it will distinguish us from ideologues of all stripes. It’s also a comfort in a whirlwind to reflect that in the long run truth can sometimes be the strongest weapon.

Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld – Radical extremists

Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.

---President George W. Bush (2004)

Few in the 9/11-Truth community doubt that that the motive for the attacks was the Bush administration’s determination to create the pretext for the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq and going forward perhaps new wars in 2007 against Syria and Iran. Many have pointed to the neoconservative Project for the New American Century document, "Rebuilding America’s Defenses," written or subscribed to by such figures as Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz which outlined plans for an "aggressive imperialism" that could not be accomplished without the new Pearl Harbor that 9/11 provided.

The 9/11 hoax in conjunction with the September 2001 anthrax attacks on Democratic Senators Daschle and Leahy enabled a bogus "war on terrorism," and an extremist attack on our constitution and civil liberties. The administration’s successfully completed agenda has so far included the Patriot Act, the rollback of habeas corpus, mass warrantless wiretapping and probable datamining, the routine torture of prisoners, hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts to build "temporary detention facilities," the "unitary" presidency and much more.

In addition, 9/11 gave the Bush administration a raison d’etre and a legitimacy hitherto lacking. Before the September 2001 attacks, polls reflected widespread public disapproval for the new Bush administration in part because it was evident that they lacked a positive national or international agenda. They seemed bent on removing the government from any constructive role in the civic life of the country. They openly pushed for the removal of environmental and regulatory safeguards; they prized power over diplomacy, and they plunged this country into reckless and unsustainable budget busting fiscal and tax policies.

Year Zero

Activist and author Naomi Klein traveled to Baghdad in 2004 and published an article entitled "Baghdad Year Zero." As her subtitle, "Pillaging Iraq in pursuit of a neocon utopia," suggests, she attributes to one faction in the Bush administration the belief that "Iraq was so contaminated that it needed to be rubbed out and remade from scratch." She reports that she saw much rubbing out but little if any remaking.

Bush administration talk of creating a democratic Middle East fooled few although it served at the time and seems still to work well for many "talking heads." The purpose of the invasion of Iraq was to destroy the possibility of civil life there. The destruction of Iraq would also cohere with the fanatical pro-Israeli proclivities of the neocons who seek to ensure that a nationalist Iraqi challenge to Israeli domination of the Middle East will never be possible. Zionist interest in maintaining the U.S. occupation of Iraq goes a long way toward explaining why there is little discernable political will in Congress demanding an immediate and total withdrawal.

In addition, the consequences of Bush administration policies reflect the same counterintuitive purpose to bring on Year Zero to the United States and the rest of the world as well. They seem determined to remove the possibility of a positive role for government everywhere.

In the classic film "It’s a Wonderful Life," the James Stewart character is presented with a nightmare vision of what life in his town would have been like absent his beneficent work. Our current all-too-real nightmares, the ones ongoing in Afghanistan, Iraq, Darfur, Burma, Palestine, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Somalia, the underside of America, and elsewhere, are tragic testimonies to the power of ruthless men in high places bent on permanent war and destruction for its own sake.


The World Trade Center Attack 9/11

This is the Damage from the W.T.C Attack

Note how the Pylons are Pushed out, not in. 

In the Below Picture's Most of the front of the Plane is in the building, yet no structual damage to building can be seen, easily Seen in Image 2, 3, and 4

A Physical impossibility 

A solid object cannot pass through another solid object

What Happens when a Plane hits a solid object like The World Trade Center ? 



 A plane crash into a concrete wall. This F-4 Phantom jet crashes into the concrete walls of a nuclear power plant at the speed of 500mph.

Video Below

The remaining beams from the Attack on the trade center 

Cut beam before clean up?

is possible that beam was cut with a torch by the crews cleaning up the debris after the collapse 
as there does appear to be striations along the two side cuts similar to what a torch cut leaves.  An
experienced welder of our group who has cut vertical beams states "Such beams are cut from the
outside with the slag being blown into the interior of the beam.  You start at the bottom and finish
at the top so that if the beam falls while the cutter is still present, it falls away from the cutter.  You
also aim your torch in the direction of the cut."  If this beam was cut at the bottom first, apparently
the cutter missed the bottom left corner.  Also if cutting proceeded from bottom to top the angular
lines seen on the side cuts would be 90 degrees opposed to what appears in the photo.  It would  
help to see a beam that was known to have been cut by an incendiary to see if they leave these    
 apparent striations.  Notice the large amount of slag on the outside of the beam very much unlike  
 that seen in the following photograph.  So far we have been unable to determine if clean-up crews
used incendiaries during clean up of the site though there were parts of a couple buildings that    
were partially destroyed that were brought down with demolition explosives by a commercial      
demolition company.  We find incendiary thermate or thermite was used exclusively by the          
military at the time of the event and its clean-up.   

The following photograph was taken by James Nachtwey, award winning Times magazine          
photographer who has taken many photographs of war atrocities.  The photograph is quite            
confirmed as having been taken on September 11, 2001, a day before any minor metal cutting on
record and at least two days before cleanup operations commenced.  A low resolution                  
        version is currently available at his web site: , the last photograph accessed via    
the bottom menu item on the left.                                                                                                     

James Nachtwey's photograph taken on September 11, 2001.

I've added numbered arrows to ends of beams raising suspicion.  1 and 2 on inspection of a larger
resolution portion of the photograph seen on the web appear to be broken butt welds, something  
we might expect to see in the ruins of a building that had collapsed.The higher resolution version of this portion
of the photo shows some beams appear to be very clean cuts, no breakage, complete and striation free    
and at 45 degrees.  Behind the arrow pointing to number 6 is another possible cut major support    
column but, though the angle appears right for being in proximity to 5 and having the same          
direction, the cut appears to be curved.

 This is a closeup image of the supposed thermite used in the Trade center attack


This is a video of the trade center attack (Below) showing timing charges going off moments before collapse of the buildings 


However hard this is to believe,


Quotes from Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

Now the WHOLE QUOTE without the taking out of context...

I know I was with an officer from Ladder 146, a Lieutenant Evangelista, who ultimately called me up a couple of days later just to find out how I was. We both for whatever reason -- again, I don't know how valid this is with everything that was going on at that particular point in time, but for some reason I thought that when I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-leve] flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q.: Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A: No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever

Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings!

 More Quotes from Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

“It was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera







First scientifically accurate visualization of 9/11 attack

Notice in this scientific analysis of the

 World trade center attack, "how the nose of the plane disintegrates on impact"


If the science says it is impossible for the nose of the plane to exit the building fully intact, then why are there multiple angles of video  showing that occuring ? 



9 11 no plane 100% total proof!!

"The hard pill to swallow"

In this video below, there is no plane moments before explosion ?



The exact same video, but amazingly now we see the so called plane

"Pause the video to see no left wing visible before impact"


911: South Tower Plane Impact

Watch this video (Below of the second plane impact),

notice the plane fully inside the building,

"Yet no structural damage to Building until explosion"

Osama Bin Laden Was Murdered In 2001:  Former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto Tells all. 

 Osama Bin Laden has been the blame by many for the 9/11 attacks against the Americans. Recently in 2011, the  announcement of the World number 1 terrorists leader's death, caused many to rejoice and celebrate.

 Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December [2001] and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. The remnants of Osama's gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama's ghost alive or because they have no means of communication.    

News Reports from around the world of Osama Bin Laden's Death before 2011

Karzai: bin Laden 'probably' dead

Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead, but former Taliban leader Mullah Omar is alive, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has said. [CNN]

FBI: Bin Laden 'probably' dead

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. [BBC]

Magazine runs what it calls bin Laden's will

The editor-in-chief of a London-based Arab news magazine said a purported will it published Saturday was written late last year [2001] by Osama bin Laden, and shows "he's dying or he's going to die soon." [CNN]

US forces kill Al Qaeda figurehead in firefight  2011


Updated Wed May 4, 2011 1:05pm AEST

    * Video: Obama confirms bin Laden's death (ABC News)
    * Video: Bin Laden's murderous reach (ABC News)
    * Related Story: Key facts: Osama bin Laden
    * Related Story: Bin Laden: 9/11 architect who defied the US
    * Related Link: Full text: Barack Obama's speech
    * Related Link: Profile: Osama bin Laden
    * Related Link: Four Corners: Prime suspect
    * Related Link: Late Night Live: Has Osama bin Laden failed?

Tonight is a testament to the greatness of our country... we are reminded that America can do whatever we set our minds to

– US president Barack Obama

We have never forgotten your loss nor wavered in our commitment to do whatever it takes to prevent further attacks on our shores

– Barack Obama to the families of 9/11 victims

The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done

– George W Bush

US president Barack Obama has confirmed the United States has conducted an operation in which Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed.

Mr Obama made the statement during an address broadcast around the world earlier this afternoon.

"The United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of Al Qaeda - a terrorist who is responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women and children," he said.

    * Al Qaeda leader killed in firefight
    * US has custody of bin Laden's body
    * Americans erupt in joyous celebration
    * Obituary: Osama bin Laden
    * Full coverage on ABC News 24

The confirmation follows widespread media reports that bin Laden was killed in a mansion outside Pakistan's capital Islamabad last week.

Mr Obama said he was briefed last August on a lead that bin Laden was hiding inside "a compound deep inside Pakistan".

"Last week [it was] determined we had enough information to attack the compound," he said.

"Today at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad in Pakistan.

"A small team of Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body."

Bin Laden was reportedly identified by the assault force and shot in the head.

No Americans or civilians were injured during in the mission, Mr Obama said.

US officials said the operation that killed bin Laden lasted less than 40 minutes and also left three other men and a woman dead, including a son of the Al Qaeda chief.

Two of the men worked as couriers for bin Laden and the third was believed to be an adult son of bin Laden, the official said.

"One woman was killed when she was used as a shield by a male combatant. Two other women were injured," the official added.

US forces lost a helicopter in the operation due to "mechanical failure" and the chopper was destroyed by the Americans, the official said.

Other US officials said they were stunned when intelligence reports first revealed the elaborate security at the compound where bin Laden was hiding, with 12-18 foot high walls topped with barbed wire.

Early reports said bin Laden had been killed along with 20 other people.

"The death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our effort to defeat Al Qaeda," Mr Obama said.

"Tonight is a testament to the greatness of our country... we are reminded that America can do whatever we set our minds to."

The 54-year-old Saudi had been the most wanted man in the world since 2001 when he helped orchestrate the September 11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

"It was nearly 10 years ago that a bright September day was darkened by an attack on the American people," Mr Obama said.

"Nearly 3,000 citizens were taken from us, leaving a gaping hole in our hearts.

"We reaffirmed our ties to each other, our love of community and country.

"We were united as one American family.

"We were also united in our resolve to protect our nation... we went to war against Al Qaeda.

"The American people did not choose this fight. It came to our shores and started with the senseless slaughter of our citizens."

Mr Obama reaffirmed the US was not at war with Islam.

"Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he killed scores of Muslims."

Mr Obama said he had a message for the families of the victims of the September 11 attacks.

"We have never forgotten your loss nor wavered in our commitment to do whatever it takes to prevent further attacks on our shores," he said.

Officials say the US is ensuring bin Laden's body is being handled in accordance with Islamic practice and tradition.

The killing of bin Laden is a major accomplishment for Mr Obama and his national security team, fulfilling the goal once voiced by Mr Obama's predecessor, George W Bush, to bring bin Laden to justice.

Mr Bush, who was in office at the time of the September 11 attacks and famously said he wanted bin Laden dead or alive, said his death was a "momentous achievement".

"The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done," Mr Bush said in a statement.

US soldiers and Afghan militia forces launched a large-scale assault on the Tora Bora mountains after the attacks in pursuit of bin Laden.

The trail quickly went cold after he disappeared and many intelligence officials believed he had been hiding in Pakistan.

While in hiding, bin Laden had taunted the West and advocated his militant Islamist views in videotapes spirited from his hideaway.

Besides September 11, the US has also linked bin Laden to a string of attacks, including the 1998 bombings of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and the 2000 bombing of the warship USS Cole in Yemen.

The death of bin Laden will raise huge questions about the future shape of Al Qaeda and also have steep implications for US security and foreign policy 10 years into a global anti-terror campaign.

It will also raise fears that the United States and its allies will face retaliation from supporters of bin Laden and other Islamic extremist groups.

Chants of "USA, USA" rang out from tourists outside the White House as reports of bin Laden's death sent an electric charge through Washington.

A large group of people gathered outside the fence of the presidential mansion sung the US national anthem and started shouting and cheering.

Despite the decade that has elapsed since the September 11 attacks, the event, one of the most traumatic in US history, still stirs raw emotions, and bin Laden's demise will be celebrated across the United States.

Tags: unrest-conflict-and-war, terrorism, september-11-attacks, afghanistan, pakistan, united-states

First posted Mon May 2, 2011 12:48pm AEST 

Tonight is a testament to the greatness of our country... we are reminded that America can do whatever we set our minds to

– US president Barack Obama


We have never forgotten your loss nor wavered in our commitment to do whatever it takes to prevent further attacks on our shores

– Barack Obama to the families of 9/11 victims


The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done

– George W Bush

Osama bin laden briefly talking about the people who blew up the pentagon.

Obama UFO Document Request

Note how The topic ufo or alien is met with ridicule

The fact that there is life in our universe is immense, however the first mention of alien's or ufo is met by the public with disbelief and must be lies or fake. is it that hard for that small 1% chance that YES, there is life other than ourselves and they might have visited us in the past.

"Obama's staff briefed to the UFO topic by Steven Greer"

Steven Greer is the ex director for C.S.E.T.I (The Center for search for Extra terrestrial intelligence)
He Like allot of People want the public to Know the truth that is being withheld by the Governments Elite


"The only truth is the reality you create. Keep living the lie, and soon it will be too late."

"There is more in heaven and earth..."   William Shakespeare (1564 - 1616), "Hamlet", Act 1 scene 5





Coming soon.

Project Awaken






Contact me

Truth is my religion



Contact Us

HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
Make a Free Website with Yola.